Dr. Khan has undertaken a hefty responsibility to untangle the ‘myth’ of women artistes in Pakistan, showing both the affect and effect they have had over its cultural landscape and social and political history. But in its entirety the book is difficult to read and comprehend: it deals with many subjects at a time. It makes use of many Marxist theorists and cultural critics. The work is pioneering in itself as it makes for an important and marked distinction from the regular (Western) discourse on brown/Muslim women.
The title of the book is borrowed from a popular Greek myth, that of the Sirens (dangerous creatures, combination of women and birds) that use melodies and songs to lure sailors and cause shipwrecks. The book’s subjects (women singers) here, however, take charge of the milieu they are part of, leaving an indelible mark on the cultural and social psyche of an Islamist state like Pakistan. And somehow they become part of the political project itself!
As per Althusser’s ISAs, Madame Noor Jehan eventually became part of a state-centric ideology that made her the ‘national/cultural icon’
The book explains this by citing Antonio Gramsci’s “individual subjects caught within ideologies” and it is further explicated by Louis Althusser’s Theory of Interpellation (as provided in the book and something of a recurring theme). French Marxist philosopher Althusser explains that “subjects (ideology)” not individuals matter – the latter can only become important when “interpellated” or “hailed” by a (dominant) ideology. This happens when they are made to believe that cultural norms or ideologies are intrinsic. These are propagated by certain “structures” like school, church, media or sometimes the civil society and hence are the “Ideological State Apparatus” (ISAs), setting the basis of a particular ideology. Unlike the Repressive State Apparatus (RSAs) that uses violence like a police or military force, ISAs are more pervasive, prevalent and have a lasting influence.
The book presents many vantage points, exploring their ‘gendered contribution’ in creating some space. Going back to the title of the book, though, it can be said that these women singers despite the political and religious inhibitions did chart their own journey, but in some instances they also became part of a state-centric narrative. One such example can be taken from Madame Noor Jehan’s illustrious career (who also sang Faiz’s poetry), immortalized by her contribution to the “national cause” in the form of patriotic tunes during the 1965 and 1971 war, such as “aye watan ke sajele jawano” and “aye puttar hattan tey nai vikade.”
Here, as per Althusser’s ISAs, Madame Noor Jehan eventually became part of a state-centric ideology that made her the ‘national/cultural icon’. Dr. Khan argues that in doing so, Madame Noor Jehan through her “power of agency” gave a spiritual angle to something that was purely rhetorical and nationalistic, thus in a way defying the tradition of war. This does not take away the fact that in Pakistan’s national, political and historical consciousness, it also valourized war (the ‘Muslimness’ of Pakistani men), the ‘righteousness’ of the national/common cause and reserved Pakistani women in a subversive, pietistic frame.
Dr. Khan, a trained vocalist herself and an authority on the subject, has made an immense contribution to cultural studies in and on Pakistan
The book makes use of Faiz’s own interpretation and contribution in developing Pakistan’s culture, keeping in view ideological preferences. In doing so, it differentiates between high (classical music) and low art (folk music), making space for the latter and social/national acceptance for the former. This, as has been argued in the book, also gave Pakistan its own ‘brand of music’ against the classical North Indian music, which kept its Muslimness intact, thereby connecting Faiz’s idea of Pakistani culture with present day ventures like Coke Studio.
Coke Studio being a capitalist platform juxtaposes liberal, urban, English-speaking educated women like Meesha Shafi and Zoe Viccaji with male singers (folk performers). In doing so, these women do appear to have established their own space and agency (under neoliberal feminism). They however do not disrupt anything in particular but rather become part of a nationalist project that Coke Studio has been turning into of late.
Dr. Khan argues that we must understand these female singers as “these young Sufi-pop-rock divas as ‘localized’ instantiations of a certain kind of Muslim female, even perhaps a Muslim feminist subjectivity that has always/already been there”. And later on: “Without insisting that these pop divas and the musical fusion they perform be seen only through the (imperialist-identified) lens of a performative ‘progressive’ politics of neo-liberalism?” Consequentially, if these two statements (either collectively or separately) are broken down, it can be said that this “Muslim feminist subjectivity” which is seen through the lens of “performative progressive politics of neo-liberalism” cannot appear to be secular, as it has found itself in an already developed and acceptable space in the West.
Dr. Khan, a trained vocalist herself and an authority on the subject, has made an immense contribution to cultural studies in and on Pakistan. The book has deciphered and deconstructed the narrative built around Pakistani women singers, showing them as pioneers and performers who against patriarchy hold their own agency. On the whole, it is a highly complex, fascinating and spell-binding read. Taking the journey of classical Hindustani music from the pre-partition era and the disfiguration of tawaif/courtesan culture, the book has traversed a great process: from showing the changing “ashraf” norms to “middle-class sensibilities”, it makes an important case about the role of Pakistani women singers. To understand its various themes in one reading – regarding postcolonial and cultural studies and feminism in post-partition Pakistan – is akin to impossible. It requires compulsory revisiting and mandatory additional reading!