As the world navigates an era of shifting geopolitical alliances, the incarceration of former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan presents a defining moment for international diplomacy. Since the 5th of August 2023, Khan has been held in a tiny prison cell under the directive of Pakistan’s military leadership—an act that has drawn sharp condemnation from human rights organisations and US lawmakers alike. The case has also underscored the deep-rooted tensions between civilian governance and military influence in Pakistan.
In a recent letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, US Representatives Joe Wilson and August Pfluger made a forceful appeal for US intervention:
“Former PM Imran Khan has been the victim of massive judicial abuse, not unlike President Trump. He was imprisoned on trumped-up charges after a military coup that saw the suspension of democracy in Pakistan.”
Their words reflect a growing concern in Washington that the military regime’s repressive tactics are not only an assault on democratic governance but a direct threat to US strategic interests.
Imran Khan’s Role in US strategic interests
Despite his independent foreign policy stance, Imran Khan could play a crucial role in counterbalancing China’s growing influence in Pakistan. While Khan has historically criticised US policies, his advocacy for national sovereignty does not preclude collaboration with Washington—particularly in areas of mutual concern, such as counterterrorism and economic development.
Unlike the military establishment, which has deep economic ties to Beijing, Khan has shown a willingness to challenge Pakistan’s overreliance on Chinese infrastructure investments under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). His leadership could provide the US with an honest broker in Pakistan, capable of fostering a more balanced geopolitical alignment.
Political benefits for Trump
Domestically, advocating for Khan’s release would strengthen Trump’s pro-democracy credentials. A vocal champion of sovereignty and anti-globalist policies, Trump could present his support for Khan as part of a broader commitment to resisting authoritarian overreach. As Wilson and Pfluger emphasised in their letter: “We urge you to work with Pakistan to restore democracy, human rights, the rule of law, and respect for the fundamental guarantees of due process, freedom of press, freedom of assembly, and freedom of speech for the people of Pakistan.”
The parallels between Trump’s legal battles and Khan’s persecution are not lost on many conservatives. Trump’s base, which sees him as a victim of politically motivated prosecutions, may view Khan’s plight as a cautionary tale about deep-state overreach. Supporting Khan’s freedom could resonate with Trump’s supporters while also reinforcing America’s commitment to democracy abroad.
Combating illicit activities in Balochistan
Beyond its political significance, Pakistan’s internal instability has tangible consequences for regional security. The province of Balochistan remains a hub for illicit activities, including drug trafficking and money laundering linked to Iranian oil smuggling.
These networks—allegedly operating under the protection of Pakistan’s establishment—pose a direct challenge to US interests in curbing transnational crime. Addressing these threats requires the US to pressure Pakistan’s leadership to crack down on corruption and dismantle illicit smuggling routes that destabilise the region.
Addressing human rights violations
The international outcry over Khan’s imprisonment reflects broader concerns about Pakistan’s deteriorating human rights situation. The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention has unequivocally deemed Khan’s incarceration illegal, a conclusion echoed by US lawmakers such as Rep. Jack Bergman. The military backed government’s crackdown on dissent—including the targeting of journalists and activists—mirrors the worst excesses of past authoritarian regimes. As Wilson and Pfluger rightly pointed out: “The end of military rule in Pakistan is critical for the development of a truly strong US-Pakistan relationship.”
If Washington is serious about promoting democracy, it must condition its economic engagement and diplomatic policy on Pakistan’s adherence to international human rights standards
If Washington is serious about promoting democracy, it must condition its economic engagement and diplomatic policy on Pakistan’s adherence to international human rights standards. A Pakistan where political leaders are arbitrarily imprisoned is a Pakistan that cannot be a reliable partner.
Promoting transparency and accountability
A key obstacle to reform in Pakistan is the entrenched power of the military elite, whose unchecked influence subverts democratic processes. The current military leadership’s role in Khan’s detention is emblematic of this problem. Identifying and exposing errant generals and security operatives who manipulate Pakistan’s political landscape will be essential in ensuring that future elections are not tainted by military interference.
The US should explore targeted measures, including asset freezes and visa restrictions, to hold such individuals accountable. Transparency is not just a moral imperative—it is a strategic necessity for fostering long-term stability in the region.
The path forward
Pakistan stands at a crossroads. The decision to either uphold democratic norms or succumb to military autocracy will have profound consequences, not just for the country itself but for regional stability. By advocating for Imran Khan’s release, the US has an opportunity to champion democratic governance while countering Chinese influence and disrupting illicit financial networks.
For Donald Trump, this moment presents a rare chance to recalibrate America’s approach to Pakistan. By supporting democratic forces over military strongmen, he can help restore US credibility and strengthen alliances in South Asia. However, this requires more than rhetoric—it demands tangible action, including diplomatic pressure, strategic economic incentives, and targeted measures against those undermining democracy.
As Wilson and Pfluger concluded in their letter: “Imran Khan deserves to be treated as any other politician would be. He does not belong in prison, and his persecution is a stain on Pakistan’s history.” These words should serve as a clarion call for all who value democracy to take a stand.
The international community cannot afford to remain silent. The time to act is now.
(The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily represent the editorial position of TFT.)