How Closing Restaurants Early Could Cost Millions Of Jobs In Lahore

Lahore, often eulogised as the heart of Pakistan's culinary scene, has historically pulsed with life, especially as the sun sets. But recent policies have cast a dark shadow on this vibrant panorama, with implications far beyond the world of fine dining.

How Closing Restaurants Early Could Cost Millions Of Jobs In Lahore

A Chronology of Curtailments

It began on December 16 2022, when Lahore's restaurants were met with a jarring edict: a mandate to close shop by 10 pm. This decree, an attempt to combat the city's smog crisis, came from the chambers of the Honorable Judge of the High Court, Justice Shahid Karim. It was a blow to the city's spirited nightlife, especially during the zenith of the festive December month.

A slight reprieve came on January 27 2023, with the court extending operational hours to 11 pm and delivery timings till 12:30 am. By May 16, there was further solace as weekend hours extended until midnight. But, the judicial tide turned again on August 19.

An Economic Pulse Check

Now, one might wonder, "Why the furor over a mere hour?" To comprehend the magnitude, it's essential to grasp that restaurants in Lahore do approximately 60% of their business post 9:00 PM. In an economically challenging landscape, these restrictions don't merely slice an hour; they chip away at the economic heartbeat of the city.

December accentuates this, as Lahore witnesses a surge of about 600,000 additional souls. Expatriates, global citizens with roots in Lahore, pour in, bringing with them not just stories from afar but also foreign currency – a lifeline for a nation grappling with dwindling foreign reserves. With restaurants acting as a primary conduit for these funds, the impact of restricted hours is economically palpable.

The Smog Conundrum: Lack Of Evidentiary Link With Restaurants

One of the more perplexing facets of this decision revolves around its grounding principle: combating smog. It's imperative to clarify that while smog is a concerning environmental issue for Lahore and several other cities worldwide, the correlation between restaurant operational hours and smog production lacks empirical evidence.

Restaurants primarily contribute to the economy through service and hospitality, not industrial emissions. The major contributors to smog, according to environmental studies, are vehicular emissions, industrial output, and certain agricultural practices. Curtailing restaurant hours seems misplaced when there's no direct evidence linking their operations to smog's exacerbation.

Moreover, by inadvertently pushing consumers towards outskirts eateries post-curfew or encouraging more vehicular movement during condensed operational hours, we might be increasing the very environmental footprint we aim to decrease. Thus, not only is the policy misdirected in addressing the root causes of smog, but it may inadvertently aggravate the situation.

In light of this, it's essential that policies aimed at environmental betterment are rooted in concrete scientific evidence and target the primary contributors to the problem, rather than industries like restaurants that have minimal to no direct link with smog production.

The 24-Hour Argument

Amidst this backdrop, there arises a radical proposition: Why not operate restaurants 24 hours a day?

1.     Economic Boost: With Pakistan currently facing a deficit in foreign reserves, maximizing avenues for income becomes paramount. Keeping restaurants open round-the-clock means catering to a larger audience, notably including those who work non-traditional hours, like in call centers, hospitals, and the emerging tech industry.

2.     Tourism and Hospitality: The global traveler is accustomed to cities that never sleep. Tourists, especially from the West, often seek late-night or early-morning eateries. To truly globalize Lahore's appeal, its dining scene must cater to these international rhythms.

3.     Job Creation: One of the direct benefits of extended operating hours is job creation. Restaurants would need more staff for the extended hours, leading to more employment opportunities.

4.     Safety and Regulation: One unintended consequence of early closures has been the mushrooming of unregulated eateries on the city's outskirts. These establishments, often skirting health and safety norms, could be brought under the fold with a 24-hour operational model. This would ensure that late-night patrons are not compromising on safety or quality.

5.     Cultural Evolution: Global cities, from New York to Tokyo, have embraced the 24-hour model, reflecting their dynamic, always-on nature. For Lahore to claim its spot on this global stage, it must adapt to these changing rhythms.

In conclusion, while the initial intention behind curtailing restaurant timings might have been rooted in addressing environmental concerns, the broader economic context cannot be overlooked. Policies need a holistic perspective, factoring in economic, cultural, and global dynamics. As Lahore stands on the cusp of a new economic era, the question remains: Will it seize the moment or let the opportunity slip into the night?